Balamurugan, through his natural guardian meenatshi vs Mohan Dass — 85/2025

Case under Guardians &Amp;amp; Wards Act, 1890 Section 10,25. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNRM010031612025

e-Filing Number

08-09-2025

Filing Number

678/2025

Filing Date

11-Sep-2025

Registration No

85/2025

Registration Date

03-Nov-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Guardians &Amp;amp; Wards Act, 1890 Section 10,25

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Balamurugan, through his natural guardian meenatshi

    Adv. Ramalingam Arumugam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mohan Dass

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The court appointed the petitioner (Balamurugan) as the legal guardian of his 60% physically disabled sister (Minakshi) under the Guardianship and Wards Act, 1890, as the respondent raised no valid objection and the petitioner's testimony and supporting documents established the necessity and propriety of the guardianship arrangement to ensure proper care and access to disability benefits for his vulnerable sister. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Principal District Judge

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  8. 07-Jan-2026

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  9. 08-Dec-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  10. 03-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 11-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 85/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court appointed the petitioner (Balamurugan) as the legal guardian of his 60% physically disabled sister (Minakshi) under the Guardianship and Wards Act, 1890, as the respondent raised no valid objection and the petitioner's testimony and supporting documents established the necessity and propriety of the guardianship arrangement to ensure proper care and access to disability benefits for his vulnerable sister. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case