Union Bank of India, Rameswaram, Rep by its Manager vs Ignatius — 149/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7, Rule 1 to 9,34. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 07th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRM010030002025
Filing Number
643/2025
Filing Date
29-08-2025
Registration No
149/2025
Registration Date
08-09-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram
Judge
2-Additional District Judge
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Union Bank of India, Rameswaram, Rep by its Manager
Adv. Thiru. K. Thangaraj
Respondent(s)
Ignatius
Janarthan Francis
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional District Judge
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Ex-Parte Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 24-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 03-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 11-12-2025 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court decreed Union Bank of India's suit for loan recovery against defendants Ignatius and Janarathan Fracis. The defendants failed to repay Rs.12,11,368.46 borrowed for purchasing a motorboat despite proper loan documents (promissory note, hypothecation agreement, and guarantee deed) and demand notices. The court ordered the defendants to pay the suit amount within 3 months with 8.85% p.a. interest from the plaint date until decree, followed by 6% p.a. thereafter, as the defendants appeared ex parte and provided no defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court decreed Union Bank of India's suit for loan recovery against defendants Ignatius and Janarathan Fracis. The defendants failed to repay Rs.12,11,368.46 borrowed for purchasing a motorboat despite proper loan documents (promissory note, hypothecation agreement, and guarantee deed) and demand notices. The court ordered the defendants to pay the suit amount within 3 months with 8.85% p.a. interest from the plaint date until decree, followed by 6% p.a. thereafter, as the defendants appeared ex parte and provided no defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts