Paneerselvam vs Ravikularaman — 18/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 21 Rule 11,Order 21 Rule 54, 66 & 72. Status: For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNRM010025302025
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
e-Filing Number
02-07-2025
Filing Number
532/2025
Filing Date
21-07-2025
Registration No
18/2025
Registration Date
25-07-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Paneerselvam
Adv. Thavampetraval N
Respondent(s)
Ravikularaman
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim
Orders
Orders
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim |
| 23-03-2026 | Orders |
| 12-03-2026 | Orders |
| 05-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 23-02-2026 | Enquiry |
Interim Orders
Summary: The execution petition filed by K. Panneerselvam (decree holder) against B. Ravikularaman (judgment debtor) for recovery of Rs. 15,00,000 with interest has been allowed. The court ordered attachment and sale of the property described in the schedule to realize the decree amount, with attachment to be completed by 02.06.2026. The respondent's objection that an ex-parte decree was obtained by providing a wrong address was rejected since he failed to file an application to stay execution proceedings or provide details of his petition to set aside the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The execution petition filed by K. Panneerselvam (decree holder) against B. Ravikularaman (judgment debtor) for recovery of Rs. 15,00,000 with interest has been allowed. The court ordered attachment and sale of the property described in the schedule to realize the decree amount, with attachment to be completed by 02.06.2026. The respondent's objection that an ex-parte decree was obtained by providing a wrong address was rejected since he failed to file an application to stay execution proceedings or provide details of his petition to set aside the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts