Athiveerapandian vs Special District Revenue Officer, Land Acquisition High Ways, Ramanathapuram — 39/2021
Case under Arbitrationandconciliationact Section 34(2). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNRM010018432019
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
Filing Number
412/2019
Filing Date
03-06-2019
Registration No
39/2021
Registration Date
22-10-2021
Court
Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Athiveerapandian
Adv. S. Jeyachandran
Respondent(s)
Special District Revenue Officer, Land Acquisition High Ways, Ramanathapuram
The Project Director , National High way, Karaikudi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 22-01-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary In this Original Petition (Ar.O.P. No.39/2021) from the Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram, dated 06.02.2025, the court examined witness testimony regarding land valuation in a land acquisition case. The court analyzed the witness's cross-examination concerning property boundaries, market rates, and government guidance values for the disputed land (Survey Numbers 132/2A and 132/1B). The case involves disputes over land pricing, with evidence indicating market values significantly exceeding government-fixed rates. The examination was concluded with "No further cross-examination," and the case proceeds to the next stage of judicial determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In this Original Petition (Ar.O.P. No.39/2021) from the Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram, dated 06.02.2025, the court examined witness testimony regarding land valuation in a land acquisition case. The court analyzed the witness's cross-examination concerning property boundaries, market rates, and government guidance values for the disputed land (Survey Numbers 132/2A and 132/1B). The case involves disputes over land pricing, with evidence indicating market values significantly exceeding government-fixed rates. The examination was concluded with "No further cross-examination," and the case proceeds to the next stage of judicial determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts