Anguchami (Died) vs Special District Revenue Officer , National High way, Ramanathapuram. Advocate - Thiru. P.Muniasamy — 42/2022

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 34(2). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 02-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNRM010018422019

Filing Number

411/2019

Filing Date

03-Jun-2019

Registration No

42/2022

Registration Date

13-Jul-2022

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 34(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anguchami (Died)

    Adv. S. Jeyachandran

  2. 2.Mari

  3. 3.Ganeshkumar

  4. 4.Gopinath

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Special District Revenue Officer , National High way, Ramanathapuram. Advocate - Thiru. P.Muniasamy

  2. 2.The project Director National Highways 49 National Highways authorities of India

Case History

  1. 02-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    Await Reports

    Principal District Judge

  8. 27-Nov-2025

    Await Reports

    Principal District Judge

  9. 05-Nov-2025

    Await Reports

    Principal District Judge

  10. 08-Oct-2025

    Await Reports

    Principal District Judge

  11. 11-Sep-2025

    Await Reports

    Principal District Judge

  12. 14-Aug-2025

    Mediation

    Principal District Judge

  13. 08-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  14. 01-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  15. 18-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  16. 02-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  17. 13-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  18. 25-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  19. 03-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  20. 06-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  21. 06-Feb-2025

    Copy of depositionView PDF

    Case Summary Case No: Ar.O.P. No.42/2022 | Date: 06.02.2025 | Court: Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's arguments regarding land valuation and survey matters. The witness was recalled and examined on various aspects including land boundaries, comparable property prices, government guideline rates versus market rates, and documentary evidence. The court found that the District Collector's valuation order was properly based on submitted deeds and documents, and the special district revenue officer's assessment was justified. No further inquiry was ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  22. 06-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  23. 29-Jan-2025

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  24. 29-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  25. 08-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  26. 06-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  27. 26-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  28. 18-Nov-2024

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  29. 07-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  30. 24-Oct-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District Judge

  31. 18-Oct-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District Judge

  32. 14-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  33. 01-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  34. 24-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  35. 12-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  36. 04-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  37. 22-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  38. 12-Aug-2024

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  39. 12-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  40. 07-Aug-2024

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  41. 07-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  42. 22-Jul-2024

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  43. 12-Jul-2024

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  44. 03-Jun-2024

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  45. 30-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  46. 24-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  47. 05-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  48. 01-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  49. 21-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  50. 12-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  51. 16-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  52. 29-Jan-2024

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  53. 29-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  54. 18-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  55. 06-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  56. 15-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  57. 07-Dec-2023

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  58. 07-Dec-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  59. 01-Dec-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  60. 21-Nov-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  61. 15-Nov-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  62. 01-Nov-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  63. 14-Oct-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  64. 12-Oct-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  65. 10-Oct-2023

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  66. 07-Oct-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  67. 20-Sep-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  68. 09-Sep-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  69. 07-Sep-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  70. 02-Sep-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  71. 14-Aug-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  72. 12-Aug-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  73. 05-Aug-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  74. 19-Jul-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  75. 10-Jul-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  76. 08-Jul-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  77. 27-Jun-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  78. 14-Jun-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  79. 01-Jun-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  80. 19-Apr-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  81. 06-Apr-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  82. 21-Mar-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  83. 14-Mar-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  84. 13-Mar-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  85. 01-Mar-2023

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  86. 14-Feb-2023

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  87. 28-Jan-2023

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  88. 06-Jan-2023

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  89. 07-Dec-2022

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  90. 23-Nov-2022

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  91. 26-Oct-2022

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  92. 26-Sep-2022

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  93. 30-Aug-2022

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  94. 17-Aug-2022

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  95. 13-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  96. 03-Jun-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 42/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No: Ar.O.P. No.42/2022 | Date: 06.02.2025 | Court: Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's arguments regarding land valuation and survey matters. The witness was recalled and examined on various aspects including land boundaries, comparable property prices, government guideline rates versus market rates, and documentary evidence. The court found that the District Collector's valuation order was properly based on submitted deeds and documents, and the special district revenue officer's assessment was justified. No further inquiry was ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case