Pitchai vs Kaliyammal (Died) — 38/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7,Rule1to6. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 08-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNRM010017912024

Filing Number

207/2024

Filing Date

27-Mar-2024

Registration No

38/2024

Registration Date

27-Mar-2024

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

2-Additional District Judge

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7,Rule1to6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pitchai

    Adv. Thiru. R.A.Muthuraman

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kaliyammal (Died)

  2. 2.Kannathasan

  3. 3.Bharathithasan

  4. 4.Kalidas

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of depositionView PDF

    Case Summary Case No.: OS.38/2024 | Date: 12.03.2026 | Court: Additional District Court, Ramanathapuram Outcome: The petition is dismissed with maximum costs. The court found that the plaintiff's claims regarding land purchase agreements and property transfers were not substantiated. Defendants 2-3 are also relieved from the case as unnecessary parties, with costs awarded against the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  10. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  11. 17-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  12. 29-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  13. 09-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  14. 05-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  15. 21-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  16. 07-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  17. 05-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  18. 17-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  19. 04-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  20. 07-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  21. 10-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Judge

  22. 13-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  23. 12-Apr-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Judge

  24. 04-Apr-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Judge

  25. 20-Mar-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Judge

  26. 28-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Judge

  27. 30-Jan-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Judge

  28. 10-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  29. 11-Dec-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  30. 21-Nov-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  31. 05-Nov-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  32. 21-Oct-2024

    Steps

    Principal District Judge

  33. 04-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  34. 30-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  35. 13-Sep-2024

    Steps

    Principal District Judge

  36. 23-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  37. 26-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  38. 18-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  39. 29-Apr-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  40. 27-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  41. 27-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 38/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No.: OS.38/2024 | Date: 12.03.2026 | Court: Additional District Court, Ramanathapuram Outcome: The petition is dismissed with maximum costs. The court found that the plaintiff's claims regarding land purchase agreements and property transfers were not substantiated. Defendants 2-3 are also relieved from the case as unnecessary parties, with costs awarded against the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case