City Union Bank, Ramanathapuram Branch Manager P.Saravanapandi vs Karthik S/o. Karmegam — 101/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7, Rule 1,26. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 02-Jun-2026

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNRM010016982021

Filing Number

278/2021

Filing Date

01-Jul-2021

Registration No

101/2024

Registration Date

09-Sep-2024

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

2-Additional District Judge

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7, Rule 1,26
Ia/2/2024 Classification : Adjournment Petition Section City Union Bank, Ramanathapuram Branch Manager P.SaravanapandiKarthik S/o. Karmegam

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.City Union Bank, Ramanathapuram Branch Manager P.Saravanapandi

    Adv. Thiru. Mohamed Sultan. J

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Karthik S/o. Karmegam

  2. 2.Dhivaybharathi W/o. Karthik

Case History

  1. 02-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Copy of depositionView PDF

    The petition is dismissed. The court rejected the defendants' arguments regarding improper court fee payment, lack of proper notice before vehicle seizure, and alleged irregularities in the bank's lending practices, holding that the bank's Original Suit for loan recovery is maintainable and the defendants' liability stands. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  10. 16-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  11. 16-Oct-2025

    Mediation

    Additional District Judge

  12. 04-Sep-2025

    Await Reports

    Additional District Judge

  13. 24-Jul-2025

    Await Reports

    Additional District Judge

  14. 14-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  15. 11-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  16. 10-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  17. 17-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  18. 13-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Judge

  19. 12-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Judge

  20. 24-Apr-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Judge

  21. 13-Mar-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Judge

  22. 13-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Judge

  23. 03-Jan-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Judge

  24. 05-Dec-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  25. 18-Nov-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  26. 04-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  27. 09-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 01-Jul-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 101/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The petition is dismissed. The court rejected the defendants' arguments regarding improper court fee payment, lack of proper notice before vehicle seizure, and alleged irregularities in the bank's lending practices, holding that the bank's Original Suit for loan recovery is maintainable and the defendants' liability stands. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case