Soundaram vs Manikavelu — 68/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7,rule1to6,26,1. Status: Additional Written Statement. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Additional Written Statement Next hearing 23-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNRM010015392025

Filing Number

291/2025

Filing Date

16-Apr-2025

Registration No

68/2025

Registration Date

16-Apr-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

2-Additional District Judge

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7,rule1to6,26,1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Soundaram

    Adv. Thiru. B.Sundararajan

  2. 2.Maheswari Alias Mariyam Beevi

    Adv. Thiru. B.Sundararajan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manikavelu

  2. 2.Santhosh Kumar

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Additional Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional District Judge

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional District Judge

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional District Judge

  7. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  8. 16-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  9. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  10. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  11. 13-Nov-2025

    Copy of depositionView PDF

    Summary: In this Tamil land dispute case (OS 68/2025) dated 13.11.2025, the Additional District Judge of Ramanathapuram recorded the cross-examination of the defendant (Manikkavelou) regarding various property transactions. The court examined the plaintiff's claims about inherited ancestral properties and subsequent land purchases made in the names of family members between 1982-1992, as well as a 2019 settlement deed gifting properties to the second defendant (the mother). The judgment rejects several of the plaintiff's contentions regarding ownership rights and the validity of the settlement deed, finding that the plaintiff failed to file the document timely and cannot claim rights to certain survey numbers. The court ruled against the plaintiff's plea for dismissal based on delay, noting insufficient grounds for such relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  13. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  14. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  15. 31-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  16. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  17. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  18. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  19. 20-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  20. 09-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  21. 26-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  22. 07-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  23. 28-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  24. 14-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  25. 11-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  26. 16-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  27. 16-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 16-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 68/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In this Tamil land dispute case (OS 68/2025) dated 13.11.2025, the Additional District Judge of Ramanathapuram recorded the cross-examination of the defendant (Manikkavelou) regarding various property transactions. The court examined the plaintiff's claims about inherited ancestral properties and subsequent land purchases made in the names of family members between 1982-1992, as well as a 2019 settlement deed gifting properties to the second defendant (the mother). The judgment rejects several of the plaintiff's contentions regarding ownership rights and the validity of the settlement deed, finding that the plaintiff failed to file the document timely and cannot claim rights to certain survey numbers. The court ruled against the plaintiff's plea for dismissal based on delay, noting insufficient grounds for such relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case