Muthanantham vs Inspector of Police, Kenikkarai Police Station — 28/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 430,415. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 24th March 2026.

CRLA - Criminal Appeal

CNR: TNRM010014892025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

07-04-2025

Filing Number

1242/2025

Filing Date

09-04-2025

Registration No

28/2025

Registration Date

09-04-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

652

Police Station

KENIKARAI P.S

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 430,415
Mp/1/2025 Classification : Others Section Muthanantham

Petitioner(s)

Muthanantham

Adv. Piranavanathan Piranavanathan

Respondent(s)

Inspector of Police, Kenikkarai Police Station

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

24-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Judgement

03-03-2026

Arguments

25-02-2026

Arguments

07-02-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram, partly allowed the appeal and modified the conviction's sentence. The court upheld the conviction of Muthanandham (A1) under IPC Section 324 (causing hurt by dangerous weapon) based on consistent eyewitness testimony and medical evidence corroborating stab injuries; however, it reduced the 6-month imprisonment to fine only, considering the accused's physically challenged status. The court rejected the defense's claims that witnesses were unreliable and that non-recovery of the weapon was fatal to the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram, partly allowed the appeal and modified the conviction's sentence. The court upheld the conviction of Muthanandham (A1) under IPC Section 324 (causing hurt by dangerous weapon) based on consistent eyewitness testimony and medical evidence corroborating stab injuries; however, it reduced the 6-month imprisonment to fine only, considering the accused's physically challenged status. The court rejected the defense's claims that witnesses were unreliable and that non-recovery of the weapon was fatal to the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case