Boopathi vs Special District Revenue Officer — 24/2024
Case under Arbitrationandconciliationact Section 34(2). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNRM010013202024
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2024
Filing Number
155/2024
Filing Date
06-03-2024
Registration No
24/2024
Registration Date
19-03-2024
Court
Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Boopathi
Adv. Thirunavukkarasu Thirunavukkarasu
Respondent(s)
Special District Revenue Officer
Project Director Nationla Highway
District Collector
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 22-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-01-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
The petition is dismissed. The court found that the petitioner's claim for increased compensation based on market rates at Rs. 2,00,000 per cent was not justified, as the compensation of Rs. 600 per square meter was already determined based on prevailing market rates for the land in question near Nagercoil, Kanyakumari district. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The petition is dismissed. The court found that the petitioner's claim for increased compensation based on market rates at Rs. 2,00,000 per cent was not justified, as the compensation of Rs. 600 per square meter was already determined based on prevailing market rates for the land in question near Nagercoil, Kanyakumari district. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts