Pathampiriyal vs Inspector of police, Uchipuli PS — 460/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM010008052026

Filing Number

586/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

460/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 24-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

08

Police Station

UCHIPULI P.S

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pathampiriyal

    Adv. Thiru. S. Shanmuganathan

  2. 2.Devadharani

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of police, Uchipuli PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram dismissed a bail petition filed by two female accused (mother and sister of the deceased) charged under BNS Sections 103(1), 61(2), 49, and 238 for allegedly assisting in the murder of their family member. The court rejected bail citing the grave nature of the offense, specific allegations against the petitioners, early investigation stage, and risk of evidence tampering and witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 460/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram dismissed a bail petition filed by two female accused (mother and sister of the deceased) charged under BNS Sections 103(1), 61(2), 49, and 238 for allegedly assisting in the murder of their family member. The court rejected bail citing the grave nature of the offense, specific allegations against the petitioners, early investigation stage, and risk of evidence tampering and witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case