Ramachandran vs Inspector of police, B1 Town PS — 459/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 12th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRM010008022026
Filing Number
583/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
459/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
31
Police Station
B1 TOWN P.S,RAMANATHAPURAM
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramachandran
Adv. Thiru. S. Shanmuganathan
Respondent(s)
Inspector of police, B1 Town PS (Police Station)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram dismissed the bail petition of Ramachandran (Accused No. 2) in a case involving charges of criminal intimidation, causing hurt with weapons, and criminal intimidation under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), and 109(1). The court denied bail considering the grave nature of the offence, the petitioner's six pending criminal cases with serious charges, the early stage of investigation with five witnesses already examined, specific evidence against the petitioner (first attacking the victim with a steel bracelet), and the risk of witness intimidation and evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram dismissed the bail petition of Ramachandran (Accused No. 2) in a case involving charges of criminal intimidation, causing hurt with weapons, and criminal intimidation under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), and 109(1). The court denied bail considering the grave nature of the offence, the petitioner's six pending criminal cases with serious charges, the early stage of investigation with five witnesses already examined, specific evidence against the petitioner (first attacking the victim with a steel bracelet), and the risk of witness intimidation and evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts