Ramachandran vs Inspector of police, B1 Town PS — 459/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM010008022026

Filing Number

583/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

459/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 24-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

31

Police Station

B1 TOWN P.S,RAMANATHAPURAM

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ramachandran

    Adv. Thiru. S. Shanmuganathan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of police, B1 Town PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram dismissed the bail petition of Ramachandran (Accused No. 2) in a case involving charges of criminal intimidation, causing hurt with weapons, and criminal intimidation under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), and 109(1). The court denied bail considering the grave nature of the offence, the petitioner's six pending criminal cases with serious charges, the early stage of investigation with five witnesses already examined, specific evidence against the petitioner (first attacking the victim with a steel bracelet), and the risk of witness intimidation and evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 459/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram dismissed the bail petition of Ramachandran (Accused No. 2) in a case involving charges of criminal intimidation, causing hurt with weapons, and criminal intimidation under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), and 109(1). The court denied bail considering the grave nature of the offence, the petitioner's six pending criminal cases with serious charges, the early stage of investigation with five witnesses already examined, specific evidence against the petitioner (first attacking the victim with a steel bracelet), and the risk of witness intimidation and evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case