Velsamy vs inspector of police — 447/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM010007722026

e-Filing Number

07-03-2026

Filing Number

566/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

447/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

57

Police Station

Kamuthi P.S.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Velsamy

    Adv. MUTHU KUMAR M

  2. 2.Devasagayam

    Adv. MUTHU KUMAR M

  3. 3.Vennila Alish Venniladevi

    Adv. MUTHU KUMAR M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.inspector of police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to three accused persons charged with assault, abuse, and criminal intimidation under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3), considering that the injured victim was discharged from hospital, substantial investigation was complete, and the accused had no criminal antecedents. The bail was conditioned on executing a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties each, daily police reporting for one month, non-tampering with evidence/witnesses, and non-absconding, with automatic cancellation if the accused failed to surrender within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 447/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to three accused persons charged with assault, abuse, and criminal intimidation under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3), considering that the injured victim was discharged from hospital, substantial investigation was complete, and the accused had no criminal antecedents. The bail was conditioned on executing a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties each, daily police reporting for one month, non-tampering with evidence/witnesses, and non-absconding, with automatic cancellation if the accused failed to surrender within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case