Ajith vs Inspector of police, Mudukulathur PS — 449/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM010007692026

Filing Number

563/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

449/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

50

Police Station

Muthukulathur PS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ajith

    Adv. MUTHUDURAY SAMY

  2. 2.Naveenkumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of police, Mudukulathur PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Principal Sessions Judge of Ramanathapuram granted bail to two accused (Ajith and Naveenkumar) charged with assault causing injuries under BNS sections, considering the nature of the offense, 17 days of incarceration, victim's hospital discharge, and investigation progress. Bail was conditioned on Rs. 10,000 bond each with sureties, twice-daily reporting to magistrate for one month, no witness tampering, and availability for interrogation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 449/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge of Ramanathapuram granted bail to two accused (Ajith and Naveenkumar) charged with assault causing injuries under BNS sections, considering the nature of the offense, 17 days of incarceration, victim's hospital discharge, and investigation progress. Bail was conditioned on Rs. 10,000 bond each with sureties, twice-daily reporting to magistrate for one month, no witness tampering, and availability for interrogation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case