Dhinakaran vs Inspector of police, Paramakudi Ps. — 448/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM010007682026

Filing Number

562/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

448/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

20

Police Station

Paramakudi Taluk P.s.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dhinakaran

    Adv. M. Soundarapandiyan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of police, Paramakudi Ps (Police Station).

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram dismissed the bail petition of Dinakaran (Accused No. 1), who was arrested on 18.02.2026 for aggravated robbery with criminal intimidation against a real estate businesswoman. The court denied bail citing the grave nature of the offence, the petitioner's criminal antecedents (5 previous similar cases pending), incomplete investigation, recovery of only partial stolen jewels, and the fact that other accused remain at large. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 448/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram dismissed the bail petition of Dinakaran (Accused No. 1), who was arrested on 18.02.2026 for aggravated robbery with criminal intimidation against a real estate businesswoman. The court denied bail citing the grave nature of the offence, the petitioner's criminal antecedents (5 previous similar cases pending), incomplete investigation, recovery of only partial stolen jewels, and the fact that other accused remain at large. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case