Prasanth vs Inspector of police, Paramakudi town PS — 450/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM010007672026

Filing Number

561/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

450/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

24

Police Station

Paramakudi Town P.S.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Prasanth

    Adv. Thiru. G.Kesavan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of police, Paramakudi town PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to Prasanth (Accused No. 2), who was arrested for illegal possession of weapons under Section 25(1A) of the Arms Act and detained for 51 days. The court imposed stringent conditions including a ₹10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 15 days, no tampering with evidence/witnesses, and non-absconding, considering the substantial completion of investigation, absence of criminal antecedents, and co-accused's prior bail grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 450/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to Prasanth (Accused No. 2), who was arrested for illegal possession of weapons under Section 25(1A) of the Arms Act and detained for 51 days. The court imposed stringent conditions including a ₹10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for 15 days, no tampering with evidence/witnesses, and non-absconding, considering the substantial completion of investigation, absence of criminal antecedents, and co-accused's prior bail grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case