MURUGAN vs Inspector of police — 445/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM010007662026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

560/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

445/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MURUGAN

    Adv. Preethi R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram, granted anticipatory bail to Murugan (aged 35) in a case involving alleged assault on a shop owner with a bamboo stick over a Rs.45 unpaid bill. The court found that since the injured was treated as an outpatient, substantial investigation was complete, and the accused had no prior criminal record, bail was warranted. The petitioner was ordered to execute a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, report daily to police for one month, and comply with conditions including non-tampering with evidence and non-absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 445/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram, granted anticipatory bail to Murugan (aged 35) in a case involving alleged assault on a shop owner with a bamboo stick over a Rs.45 unpaid bill. The court found that since the injured was treated as an outpatient, substantial investigation was complete, and the accused had no prior criminal record, bail was warranted. The petitioner was ordered to execute a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, report daily to police for one month, and comply with conditions including non-tampering with evidence and non-absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case