PALANIMURUGAN vs Inspector of police — 444/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM010007652026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

559/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

444/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PALANIMURUGAN

    Adv. Preethi R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram granted anticipatory bail to Palanimurugan, aged 29, who was accused of posting an Instagram reel showing illegal possession of a sword (offences under IT Act Section 67 and Arms Act Section 25(1A)). The court found that substantial investigation was complete, the petitioner had no criminal antecedents, and granted bail on stringent conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for one month, removal of offensive posts with a public apology, and prohibition against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 444/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram granted anticipatory bail to Palanimurugan, aged 29, who was accused of posting an Instagram reel showing illegal possession of a sword (offences under IT Act Section 67 and Arms Act Section 25(1A)). The court found that substantial investigation was complete, the petitioner had no criminal antecedents, and granted bail on stringent conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for one month, removal of offensive posts with a public apology, and prohibition against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case