PALANIMURUGAN vs Inspector of police — 444/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM010007652026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

559/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

444/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

PALANIMURUGAN

Adv. Preethi R

Respondent(s)

Inspector of police

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

09-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Issue of Service

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram granted anticipatory bail to Palanimurugan, aged 29, who was accused of posting an Instagram reel showing illegal possession of a sword (offences under IT Act Section 67 and Arms Act Section 25(1A)). The court found that substantial investigation was complete, the petitioner had no criminal antecedents, and granted bail on stringent conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for one month, removal of offensive posts with a public apology, and prohibition against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram granted anticipatory bail to Palanimurugan, aged 29, who was accused of posting an Instagram reel showing illegal possession of a sword (offences under IT Act Section 67 and Arms Act Section 25(1A)). The court found that substantial investigation was complete, the petitioner had no criminal antecedents, and granted bail on stringent conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting for one month, removal of offensive posts with a public apology, and prohibition against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case