Inspector vs Ramanathaprabhu — 439/2026
Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRM010007622026
Filing Number
556/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
439/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram
Judge
2-Additional District Judge
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Petitioner(s)
Inspector
Respondent(s)
Ramanathaprabhu
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional District Judge
Disposed
Orders
Issue of Process
Issue of Process
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Orders |
| 11-03-2026 | Issue of Process |
| 06-03-2026 | Issue of Process |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram allowed the petition under Section 497 of BNSS and ordered the return of the seized Hyundai car and Vivo mobile phone to the petitioner's custody, recognizing him as the registered owner and finding that prolonged retention would cause deterioration. However, the return was granted subject to strict conditions including a Rs.1,00,000 bond with sureties, monthly production to police, an affidavit against alienation or alteration, and a panchanama with photographs for trial purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram allowed the petition under Section 497 of BNSS and ordered the return of the seized Hyundai car and Vivo mobile phone to the petitioner's custody, recognizing him as the registered owner and finding that prolonged retention would cause deterioration. However, the return was granted subject to strict conditions including a Rs.1,00,000 bond with sureties, monthly production to police, an affidavit against alienation or alteration, and a panchanama with photographs for trial purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts