Inspector vs Ramanathaprabhu — 439/2026

Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM010007622026

Filing Number

556/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

439/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

2-Additional District Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramanathaprabhu

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram allowed the petition under Section 497 of BNSS and ordered the return of the seized Hyundai car and Vivo mobile phone to the petitioner's custody, recognizing him as the registered owner and finding that prolonged retention would cause deterioration. However, the return was granted subject to strict conditions including a Rs.1,00,000 bond with sureties, monthly production to police, an affidavit against alienation or alteration, and a panchanama with photographs for trial purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Additional District Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Issue of Process

    Additional District Judge

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 439/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram allowed the petition under Section 497 of BNSS and ordered the return of the seized Hyundai car and Vivo mobile phone to the petitioner's custody, recognizing him as the registered owner and finding that prolonged retention would cause deterioration. However, the return was granted subject to strict conditions including a Rs.1,00,000 bond with sureties, monthly production to police, an affidavit against alienation or alteration, and a panchanama with photographs for trial purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case