Manimaran vs Inspector of police, B2 bazaar PS — 441/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM010007612026

Filing Number

555/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

441/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manimaran

    Adv. Thiru. K.Gunasekaran

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of police, B2 bazaar PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment

    Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to Manimaran, accused of possessing a deadly weapon under Section 25(1A) of the Arms Act, after he had spent 15+ days in judicial custody. While acknowledging his criminal antecedents as a history sheeter and repeated offender, the court found that the substantial investigation completion and incarceration period warranted release on stringent conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily police reporting for one month, and restrictions on tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 441/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to Manimaran, accused of possessing a deadly weapon under Section 25(1A) of the Arms Act, after he had spent 15+ days in judicial custody. While acknowledging his criminal antecedents as a history sheeter and repeated offender, the court found that the substantial investigation completion and incarceration period warranted release on stringent conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily police reporting for one month, and restrictions on tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case