Sritharan vs Inspector of police, B1 town PS — 440/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM010007602026

Filing Number

554/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

440/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sritharan

    Adv. Thiru.M.Kesavan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of police, B1 town PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge dismissed the bail petition of 21-year-old Sridharan (Accused No.3), who was arrested for allegedly attacking a victim with weapons and hands, causing injuries. The court denied bail citing: (1) the petitioner's history of violating bail conditions in other cases, (2) investigation being in early stages with only five witnesses examined, and (3) the serious nature of the offences under BNS Sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), and 109(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 440/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge dismissed the bail petition of 21-year-old Sridharan (Accused No.3), who was arrested for allegedly attacking a victim with weapons and hands, causing injuries. The court denied bail citing: (1) the petitioner's history of violating bail conditions in other cases, (2) investigation being in early stages with only five witnesses examined, and (3) the serious nature of the offences under BNS Sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), and 109(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case