Irfan Alies Mohamed Irfan vs Inspector of police, Kenikkarai police station — 438/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),115(2),118(1),351(3). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM010007542026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

551/2026

Filing Date

05-03-2026

Registration No

438/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

111

Police Station

KENIKARAI P.S

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),115(2),118(1),351(3)
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

Irfan Alies Mohamed Irfan

Adv. RAJA SAHUL HAMEED M

Fayas Alies Fayas Ahamed

Adv. RAJA SAHUL HAMEED M

Asath Alies Abulkalam Asath

Adv. RAJA SAHUL HAMEED M

Respondent(s)

Inspector of police, Kenikkarai police station

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

10-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

Enquiry

05-03-2026

Issue of Service

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

The Principal Sessions Judge of Ramanathapuram granted anticipatory bail to three accused (Irfan, Biyas, and Asath) charged with assault and threats under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3). The court's decision was based on the injured person's hospital discharge, substantial investigation completion, and the accused's clean criminal record. The bail was granted with conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each, daily reporting to the Magistrate for one month, availability for interrogation, and prohibition against witness tampering or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge of Ramanathapuram granted anticipatory bail to three accused (Irfan, Biyas, and Asath) charged with assault and threats under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3). The court's decision was based on the injured person's hospital discharge, substantial investigation completion, and the accused's clean criminal record. The bail was granted with conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each, daily reporting to the Magistrate for one month, availability for interrogation, and prohibition against witness tampering or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case