Surya vs Inspector of police, Devipattinam PS — 431/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRM010007412026
Filing Number
545/2026
Filing Date
04-03-2026
Registration No
431/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Surya
Adv. M.RAJA SAHUL HAMEED
Respondent(s)
Inspector of police, Devipattinam PS (Police Station)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Enquiry
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 04-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to Suriya (Accused No. 1), aged 25, in a violent assault case involving sword and sickle attacks that caused grievous injuries. Despite earlier bail dismissal and the accused's criminal history as a "History Sheeted Rowdy," the court approved bail considering the nature of the offense, incarceration period, and injured persons' hospital discharge. Bail was granted with stringent conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, residence in Viluppuram District with daily magistrate reporting, no relaxation petitions for two months, and prohibitions on tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to Suriya (Accused No. 1), aged 25, in a violent assault case involving sword and sickle attacks that caused grievous injuries. Despite earlier bail dismissal and the accused's criminal history as a "History Sheeted Rowdy," the court approved bail considering the nature of the offense, incarceration period, and injured persons' hospital discharge. Bail was granted with stringent conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, residence in Viluppuram District with daily magistrate reporting, no relaxation petitions for two months, and prohibitions on tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts