Surya vs Inspector of police, Devipattinam PS — 431/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM010007412026

Case disposed

Filing Number

545/2026

Filing Date

04-03-2026

Registration No

431/2026

Registration Date

04-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

Surya

Adv. M.RAJA SAHUL HAMEED

Respondent(s)

Inspector of police, Devipattinam PS (Police Station)

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

09-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Enquiry

04-03-2026

Issue of Service

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to Suriya (Accused No. 1), aged 25, in a violent assault case involving sword and sickle attacks that caused grievous injuries. Despite earlier bail dismissal and the accused's criminal history as a "History Sheeted Rowdy," the court approved bail considering the nature of the offense, incarceration period, and injured persons' hospital discharge. Bail was granted with stringent conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, residence in Viluppuram District with daily magistrate reporting, no relaxation petitions for two months, and prohibitions on tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to Suriya (Accused No. 1), aged 25, in a violent assault case involving sword and sickle attacks that caused grievous injuries. Despite earlier bail dismissal and the accused's criminal history as a "History Sheeted Rowdy," the court approved bail considering the nature of the offense, incarceration period, and injured persons' hospital discharge. Bail was granted with stringent conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, residence in Viluppuram District with daily magistrate reporting, no relaxation petitions for two months, and prohibitions on tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case