Arokiyasamy vs Inspector of police, Thondi police station — 421/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM010007242026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

530/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

421/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

38

Police Station

Thondi P.S

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Arokiyasamy

    Adv. Thiru. K.Gunasekaran

  2. 2.Arokiya Crazy

    Adv. MUTHU KUMAR M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of police, Thondi police station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to the two petitioners (Arockiyasamy and Arockiya Grazy) accused of assaulting a woman during a civil land dispute, finding the injuries were minor (out-patient treatment), substantial investigation was complete, and the accused had no criminal history. The petitioners were ordered to execute a Rs.10,000 bond each with sureties, report daily to police for 15 days, and comply with conditions against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 421/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to the two petitioners (Arockiyasamy and Arockiya Grazy) accused of assaulting a woman during a civil land dispute, finding the injuries were minor (out-patient treatment), substantial investigation was complete, and the accused had no criminal history. The petitioners were ordered to execute a Rs.10,000 bond each with sureties, report daily to police for 15 days, and comply with conditions against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case