Muthukumar vs Inspector of police, b2 Bazaar PS — 426/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM010007212026

Filing Number

529/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

426/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Muthukumar

    Adv. MUTHUDURAY SAMY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of police, b2 Bazaar PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge of Ramanathapuram granted bail to Muthukumar (Accused No.6), charged with serious offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 294(b), 448, 324, 307 and PPDL Act section 3, considering his long incarceration and case stage, despite three previous cases pending against him. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, twice-daily reporting to the Magistrate for one month, cooperation with investigation, and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 426/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge of Ramanathapuram granted bail to Muthukumar (Accused No.6), charged with serious offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 294(b), 448, 324, 307 and PPDL Act section 3, considering his long incarceration and case stage, despite three previous cases pending against him. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, twice-daily reporting to the Magistrate for one month, cooperation with investigation, and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case