Amirtharaj vs Inspector of police, Chathirakudi PS — 409/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRM010006902026
Filing Number
510/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
409/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Amirtharaj
Adv. Thiru.B. Duraimurugan
Respondent(s)
Inspector of police, Chathirakudi PS (Police Station)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Enquiry
Enquiry
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 03-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 27-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram granted bail to Amirtharaj, accused of theft under Section 305(a) BNS, considering the minor nature of the offense, recovery of stolen jewelry, absence of criminal antecedents, and substantial completion of investigation. The court imposed strict conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting twice for one month, prohibition on tampering with evidence/witnesses, and non-absconding obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram granted bail to Amirtharaj, accused of theft under Section 305(a) BNS, considering the minor nature of the offense, recovery of stolen jewelry, absence of criminal antecedents, and substantial completion of investigation. The court imposed strict conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting twice for one month, prohibition on tampering with evidence/witnesses, and non-absconding obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts