Amirtharaj vs Inspector of police, Chathirakudi PS — 409/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM010006902026

Filing Number

510/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

409/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Amirtharaj

    Adv. Thiru.B. Duraimurugan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of police, Chathirakudi PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram granted bail to Amirtharaj, accused of theft under Section 305(a) BNS, considering the minor nature of the offense, recovery of stolen jewelry, absence of criminal antecedents, and substantial completion of investigation. The court imposed strict conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting twice for one month, prohibition on tampering with evidence/witnesses, and non-absconding obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 409/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram granted bail to Amirtharaj, accused of theft under Section 305(a) BNS, considering the minor nature of the offense, recovery of stolen jewelry, absence of criminal antecedents, and substantial completion of investigation. The court imposed strict conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting twice for one month, prohibition on tampering with evidence/witnesses, and non-absconding obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case