Althamis Alias Thamis vs Inspector of police, Thirupullani PS — 407/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRM010006882026
Filing Number
509/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
407/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
32
Police Station
THIRUPULLANI P.S
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Althamis Alias Thamis
Adv. Thiru.S.Mohamed Nathim
Respondent(s)
Inspector of police, Thirupullani PS (Police Station)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Enquiry
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 03-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 27-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram granted bail to Althameesh (Accused No. 2), aged 23, who was arrested for illegal possession of swords and 50 grams of ganja (cannabis), and public threats under BNS Section 296(b) and Arms Act Section 25(1-A). The court granted bail considering that the accused had been in judicial custody for over 14 days, substantial investigation was complete, properties were recovered, and the co-accused was already released on bail, subject to stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, Rs. 1,000 non-refundable deposit, daily reporting to the magistrate for one month, and restrictions against absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram granted bail to Althameesh (Accused No. 2), aged 23, who was arrested for illegal possession of swords and 50 grams of ganja (cannabis), and public threats under BNS Section 296(b) and Arms Act Section 25(1-A). The court granted bail considering that the accused had been in judicial custody for over 14 days, substantial investigation was complete, properties were recovered, and the co-accused was already released on bail, subject to stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, Rs. 1,000 non-refundable deposit, daily reporting to the magistrate for one month, and restrictions against absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts