ALAGUMALAI vs Inspector of police — 401/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM010006712026

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

498/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

401/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

5

Police Station

Kovilangulam P.S.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ALAGUMALAI

    Adv. MUTHUDURAY SAMY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram dismissed the anticipatory bail petition of Alagumalai, accused of causing death by negligence (IPC §105) and illegal electricity installation (Electricity Act §135(1)(a)). The court found the offense grave in nature and investigation at an early stage, determining custodial interrogation necessary, thereby denying anticipatory bail to enable proper investigation proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 401/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram dismissed the anticipatory bail petition of Alagumalai, accused of causing death by negligence (IPC §105) and illegal electricity installation (Electricity Act §135(1)(a)). The court found the offense grave in nature and investigation at an early stage, determining custodial interrogation necessary, thereby denying anticipatory bail to enable proper investigation proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case