Vairaprakash vs Inspector of police, Nainarkovil PS — 403/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM010006652026

Filing Number

492/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

403/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vairaprakash

    Adv. Thiru.B. Duraimurugan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of police, Nainarkovil PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram, dismissed the bail petition of Vairaprakash, accused of criminal intimidation, threatening, and attacking a friend over an unpaid loan of Rs. 29,30,420. Though the judge found the underlying dispute civil in nature, the non-bailable offenses under BNS sections 351(2) and 118, combined with the accused's Kerala residence (absconding risk), incomplete investigation, and his co-accused brother still at large, warranted continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 403/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram, dismissed the bail petition of Vairaprakash, accused of criminal intimidation, threatening, and attacking a friend over an unpaid loan of Rs. 29,30,420. Though the judge found the underlying dispute civil in nature, the non-bailable offenses under BNS sections 351(2) and 118, combined with the accused's Kerala residence (absconding risk), incomplete investigation, and his co-accused brother still at large, warranted continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case