Subramaniyan vs Senthilkumar Advocate - KS Baskar — 150/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 22. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNPD170005772022
Filing Number
150/2022
Filing Date
04-Feb-2021
Registration No
150/2022
Registration Date
04-Feb-2021
Court
Sub Court, Keeranur
Judge
1-Sub Judge
Last updated 22-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Subramaniyan
Adv. Veerappan M
Respondent(s)
-
1.Senthilkumar Advocate - KS Baskar
Case History
-
06-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
28-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
28-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 150/2022 Court: Subordinate Court, Keeranur Date: April 28, 2026 Parties: Senthilkumar (Petitioner/Defendant) vs. Subramaniyan (deceased) and others (Respondents/Plaintiffs) Outcome: The court allowed the Interlocutory Application (I.A.1/2026), accepting delayed documents filed by the defendant without penalty. The defendant's counsel argued the documents were inadvertently misplaced and recently located; the respondents presented no substantial objection. The court exercised judicial discretion in favor of justice and permitted the late filing under the Civil Procedure Code Rule 8(1)(3). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
11-Apr-2026
Orders
Sub Judge
-
06-Apr-2026
Orders
Sub Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Orders
Sub Judge
-
04-Mar-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
31-Jan-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
16-Dec-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
03-Dec-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
19-Nov-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
12-Nov-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
03-Nov-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
03-Nov-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
07-Oct-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
08-Sep-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
25-Aug-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
25-Aug-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
11-Aug-2025
Amendment
Sub Judge
-
30-Jul-2025
Amendment
Sub Judge
-
28-Jul-2025
Amendment
Sub Judge
-
16-Jul-2025
Amendment
Sub Judge
-
02-Jul-2025
Amendment
Sub Judge
-
18-Jun-2025
Amendment
Sub Judge
-
11-Jun-2025
Steps
Sub Judge
-
03-Jun-2025
Steps
Sub Judge
-
02-Jun-2025
Issue of Service
Sub Judge
-
29-Apr-2025
Steps
Sub Judge
-
22-Apr-2025
Steps
Sub Judge
-
02-Apr-2025
Steps
Sub Judge
-
24-Mar-2025
Issue of Service
Sub Judge
-
24-Mar-2025
Restored
Sub Judge
-
24-Mar-2025
Issue of Service
Sub Judge
-
28-Nov-2023
Copy of JudgementView PDF
-
28-Nov-2023
Disposed
Sub Judge
-
02-Nov-2023
Steps
Sub Judge
-
19-Oct-2023
Steps
Sub Judge
-
16-Oct-2023
Steps
Sub Judge
-
26-Sep-2023
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
29-Aug-2023
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
21-Aug-2023
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
08-Aug-2023
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
31-Jul-2023
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
31-Jul-2023
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
24-Jul-2023
Trial
Sub Judge
-
04-Jul-2023
Trial
Sub Judge
-
16-Jun-2023
Trial
Sub Judge
-
03-Jun-2023
Restored
Sub Judge
-
03-Jun-2023
Issues
Sub Judge
-
03-Jun-2023
Issues
Sub Judge
-
30-Sep-2022
Disposed
Sub Judge
-
26-Sep-2022
Judgement
Sub Judge
-
19-Sep-2022
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
07-Sep-2022
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
07-Sep-2022
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
12-Aug-2022
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
12-Jul-2022
Written Statement
Sub Judge
-
29-Jun-2022
Written Statement
Sub Judge
-
07-Jun-2022
Written Statement
Sub Judge
-
04-Apr-2022
Written Statement
-
14-Mar-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Feb-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 150/2022
Case Summary: 150/2022 Court: Subordinate Court, Keeranur Date: April 28, 2026 Parties: Senthilkumar (Petitioner/Defendant) vs. Subramaniyan (deceased) and others (Respondents/Plaintiffs) Outcome: The court allowed the Interlocutory Application (I.A.1/2026), accepting delayed documents filed by the defendant without penalty. The defendant's counsel argued the documents were inadvertently misplaced and recently located; the respondents presented no substantial objection. The court exercised judicial discretion in favor of justice and permitted the late filing under the Civil Procedure Code Rule 8(1)(3). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts