Vadivel vs Durairaj Advocate - G.Arun Kumar — 57/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(a),27(c). Status: Issue of Service. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNPD170000572022
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
Filing Number
57/2022
Filing Date
21-01-2020
Registration No
57/2022
Registration Date
21-01-2020
Court
Sub Court, Keeranur
Judge
1-Sub Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vadivel
Adv. Pannerselvam T
Respondent(s)
Durairaj Advocate - G.Arun Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 12-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 10-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 07-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 23-02-2026 | Issues |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC to implead Vaithiyanathan as the 2nd defendant was allowed. The court found that the petitioner, who claims ownership of the disputed property through a settlement deed executed by the original defendant on 05.08.2020, is a necessary party to the suit and must be added to ensure a complete adjudication. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC to implead Vaithiyanathan as the 2nd defendant was allowed. The court found that the petitioner, who claims ownership of the disputed property through a settlement deed executed by the original defendant on 05.08.2020, is a necessary party to the suit and must be added to ensure a complete adjudication. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts