Melvazhi N.Thenaramudan vs Salai sthabaran — 5/2026

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 27(c). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

IA Pending Next hearing 24-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNPD120001132026

Filing Number

7/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

5/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Illuppur

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 22-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Melvazhi N.Thenaramudan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Salai sthabaran

  2. 2.Salai sakkarai

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of Order

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of Order

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of Order

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of Order

    Case 5/2026 Summary Petition Dismissed. The court found insufficient evidence that respondents violated the court's interim order dated 04.02.2026 restricting access to the petitioner's property. While petitioners claimed respondents chemically sealed the house locks and damaged CCTV cameras on 15.02.2026, the CCTV footage and photographs submitted did not conclusively prove the respondents' involvement. The court therefore dismissed the petition seeking confiscation of respondents' property and civil imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  9. 11-Mar-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  10. 10-Mar-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  11. 04-Feb-2026

    Copy of Order

  12. 04-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 5/2026 Summary Petition Dismissed. The court found insufficient evidence that respondents violated the court's interim order dated 04.02.2026 restricting access to the petitioner's property. While petitioners claimed respondents chemically sealed the house locks and damaged CCTV cameras on 15.02.2026, the CCTV footage and photographs submitted did not conclusively prove the respondents' involvement. The court therefore dismissed the petition seeking confiscation of respondents' property and civil imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case