Mohamed Moideen vs Radha — 203/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 353. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPD110002932026

Filing Number

281/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

203/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Gandarvakkottai

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 353

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mohamed Moideen

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Radha

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The District Civil and Commercial Court at Kantharvakatai has allowed the petition permitting the accused (Mohammed Maideen) to testify as a witness in the original case. Under BNSS Section 353, an accused person is a competent witness for the defense and may give evidence to disprove charges against them, requiring only a written request. The court rejected the opposing party's objection, noting that the cited precedent from Dhanabagiyam v. N. Selvaraj was inapplicable to these facts, and permitted the accused to testify on condition that he appears in person at the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Orders

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  8. 04-Mar-2026

    Counter

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  9. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 203/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The District Civil and Commercial Court at Kantharvakatai has allowed the petition permitting the accused (Mohammed Maideen) to testify as a witness in the original case. Under BNSS Section 353, an accused person is a competent witness for the defense and may give evidence to disprove charges against them, requiring only a written request. The court rejected the opposing party's objection, noting that the cited precedent from Dhanabagiyam v. N. Selvaraj was inapplicable to these facts, and permitted the accused to testify on condition that he appears in person at the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case