Ravichandran vs Sub Inspector of Police, Gandarvakkottai. — 134/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 311. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNPD110001972026
Filing Number
190/2026
Filing Date
18-02-2026
Registration No
134/2026
Registration Date
18-02-2026
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Gandarvakkottai
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
258
Police Station
Gandharvakkottai
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ravichandran
Adv. VENKATESAN K R
Respondent(s)
Sub Inspector of Police, Gandarvakkottai.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Orders
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-03-2026 | Orders |
| 18-02-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District Court allowed the petitioner's plea under Sections 311 and 348 BNSS to recall and cross-examine witnesses (A.W.1 to A.W.3) who were examined in the original case. The court found that the petitioner's counsel was unable to cross-examine these witnesses due to unavailability of necessary documents (FIR and complaint copy), and deemed it necessary to grant this opportunity to ensure fair trial. The court directed the witnesses to appear for cross-examination with a cost compensation of Rs. 500 to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The District Court allowed the petitioner's plea under Sections 311 and 348 BNSS to recall and cross-examine witnesses (A.W.1 to A.W.3) who were examined in the original case. The court found that the petitioner's counsel was unable to cross-examine these witnesses due to unavailability of necessary documents (FIR and complaint copy), and deemed it necessary to grant this opportunity to ensure fair trial. The court directed the witnesses to appear for cross-examination with a cost compensation of Rs. 500 to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts