Ravichandran vs Sub Inspector of Police, Gandarvakkottai. — 134/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 311. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPD110001972026

Filing Number

190/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

134/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Gandarvakkottai

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

258

Police Station

Gandharvakkottai

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 311

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ravichandran

    Adv. VENKATESAN K R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sub Inspector of Police, Gandarvakkottai.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The District Court allowed the petitioner's plea under Sections 311 and 348 BNSS to recall and cross-examine witnesses (A.W.1 to A.W.3) who were examined in the original case. The court found that the petitioner's counsel was unable to cross-examine these witnesses due to unavailability of necessary documents (FIR and complaint copy), and deemed it necessary to grant this opportunity to ensure fair trial. The court directed the witnesses to appear for cross-examination with a cost compensation of Rs. 500 to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Orders

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 134/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District Court allowed the petitioner's plea under Sections 311 and 348 BNSS to recall and cross-examine witnesses (A.W.1 to A.W.3) who were examined in the original case. The court found that the petitioner's counsel was unable to cross-examine these witnesses due to unavailability of necessary documents (FIR and complaint copy), and deemed it necessary to grant this opportunity to ensure fair trial. The court directed the witnesses to appear for cross-examination with a cost compensation of Rs. 500 to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case