Perumal vs Karunanithi — 116/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 Section 311. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNPD110001732026
Filing Number
168/2026
Filing Date
16-02-2026
Registration No
116/2026
Registration Date
16-02-2026
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Gandarvakkottai
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
240
Police Station
Gandharvakkottai
Year
2005
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Perumal
Adv. M.Jayanthan
Arumugam
Respondent(s)
Karunanithi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Orders
Enquiry
Counter
Counter
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-03-2026 | Orders |
| 02-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 26-02-2026 | Counter |
| 23-02-2026 | Counter |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District Court allowed a petition to permit the re-examination of a witness (PW.1) through cross-examination under Section 311 CrPC, finding that the witness's testimony remained incomplete as cross-examination was deferred on 31.01.2026 due to the petitioners' physical indisposition. The court held that denying the opportunity for cross-examination would prejudice the petitioners' case and decided that justice requires allowing the petition, subject to the petitioners paying ₹1,000 to the witness as travel allowance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District Court allowed a petition to permit the re-examination of a witness (PW.1) through cross-examination under Section 311 CrPC, finding that the witness's testimony remained incomplete as cross-examination was deferred on 31.01.2026 due to the petitioners' physical indisposition. The court held that denying the opportunity for cross-examination would prejudice the petitioners' case and decided that justice requires allowing the petition, subject to the petitioners paying ₹1,000 to the witness as travel allowance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts