Imran Khan vs SI of Police, Aranthangi PS — 338/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPD090007152026

Filing Number

710/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

338/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Aranthangi

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

475

Police Station

Aranthangi.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Imran Khan

    Adv. Krishnon R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SI of Police, Aranthangi PS (Police Station)

  2. 2.Sudharsan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Aranthangi Judicial Magistrate Court dismissed a criminal petition (Crl.M.P.No.338/2026) filed under IPC Sections 497 & 503 seeking release of a seized vehicle (Loadking Super LWB Pickup) used in alleged sand mining violations. The court rejected the plea, holding that returning the vehicle to the petitioner would facilitate further environmental crimes, and emphasized the government's constitutional duty to protect natural resources for present and future generations, citing Supreme Court precedent on conservation of natural ecosystems. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 338/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Aranthangi Judicial Magistrate Court dismissed a criminal petition (Crl.M.P.No.338/2026) filed under IPC Sections 497 & 503 seeking release of a seized vehicle (Loadking Super LWB Pickup) used in alleged sand mining violations. The court rejected the plea, holding that returning the vehicle to the petitioner would facilitate further environmental crimes, and emphasized the government's constitutional duty to protect natural resources for present and future generations, citing Supreme Court precedent on conservation of natural ecosystems. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case