paventhan vs Si of police Aranthangi — 209/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPD090005112026

Filing Number

507/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

209/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Aranthangi

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

564

Police Station

Aranthangi.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.paventhan

    Adv. Anitha Christy.J

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Si of police Aranthangi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court at Aranthangi allowed the petitioner's application under Section 497 CrPC to obtain interim custody of a seized scooter (TN 65 AS 5478) and mobile phone involved in a gaming-related criminal case. The court found the petitioner to be the lawful owner based on documentary evidence and accepted his plea that prolonged non-use would deteriorate the vehicle's value. Custody was granted subject to conditions including Rs. 50,000 bail bonds, vehicle registration transfer within two months, and prohibition against using the vehicle in any criminal activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 209/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court at Aranthangi allowed the petitioner's application under Section 497 CrPC to obtain interim custody of a seized scooter (TN 65 AS 5478) and mobile phone involved in a gaming-related criminal case. The court found the petitioner to be the lawful owner based on documentary evidence and accepted his plea that prolonged non-use would deteriorate the vehicle's value. Custody was granted subject to conditions including Rs. 50,000 bail bonds, vehicle registration transfer within two months, and prohibition against using the vehicle in any criminal activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case