Sundararajan vs Si of police Nagudi — 171/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPD090004392026

Filing Number

436/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

171/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Aranthangi

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

10

Police Station

Nagudi.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sundararajan

    Adv. Senthilkumar KMS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Si of police Nagudi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate's court granted the petitioner's Criminal Misc. Petition under Section 497 BNS, allowing return of a cart/vehicle seized in a criminal case (Crime No. 17/2024) under Section 303(2) BNS and MMDR Act. The court found the petitioner to be the legitimate owner and that prolonged non-use would deteriorate the vehicle's value, ordering release subject to conditions including ₹10,000 bail, photographs, affidavit, and court appearance requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  8. 13-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 171/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate's court granted the petitioner's Criminal Misc. Petition under Section 497 BNS, allowing return of a cart/vehicle seized in a criminal case (Crime No. 17/2024) under Section 303(2) BNS and MMDR Act. The court found the petitioner to be the legitimate owner and that prolonged non-use would deteriorate the vehicle's value, ordering release subject to conditions including ₹10,000 bail, photographs, affidavit, and court appearance requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case