Govindhammal vs Ayyakannu — 794/2019

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,141,142,163A,163B,166,182A. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNPD010030902019

Evidence

Next Hearing

16th April 2026

Filing Number

1871/2019

Filing Date

30-09-2019

Registration No

794/2019

Registration Date

21-11-2019

Court

Principal District Court, Pudukkottai

Judge

3-Additional District and Sessions Judge

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 140,141,142,163A,163B,166,182A
TAMIL NADU MOTOR VEHICLE RULES 1989 Section 3(1)

Petitioner(s)

Govindhammal

Adv. Veeriah.N

Dhanalakshmi

Pounammal

Devi

Sivanesan

Respondent(s)

Ayyakannu

Pandiyarajan

The Branch Manager, The New India Insurance Company ltd, Madurai

Adv. Mahalingam.S

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Additional District and Sessions Judge

24-03-2026

Evidence

07-03-2026

Evidence

04-03-2026

Evidence

20-02-2026

Evidence

06-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

12-08-2025
Copy of deposition

The Additional District Judge, Pudukkottai recorded the deposition of witness P.W.1 (Sivakasan, age 36) on 12.08.2025 in MCOP No. 794/2019 concerning a motor vehicle compensation claim. The witness testified regarding the accident and supporting documents (including FIR, death certificate, inheritance certificate, insurance policy, and vehicle permit) were admitted into evidence. The deposition was read over to the witness and admitted by him as correct, with cross-examination to follow. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District Judge, Pudukkottai recorded the deposition of witness P.W.1 (Sivakasan, age 36) on 12.08.2025 in MCOP No. 794/2019 concerning a motor vehicle compensation claim. The witness testified regarding the accident and supporting documents (including FIR, death certificate, inheritance certificate, insurance policy, and vehicle permit) were admitted into evidence. The deposition was read over to the witness and admitted by him as correct, with cross-examination to follow. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Pudukkottai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case