Ganesan vs Chidambaram — 12/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNPD010025612022
Filing Number
2062/2022
Filing Date
22-Dec-2022
Registration No
12/2023
Registration Date
09-Jan-2023
Court
Principal District Court, Pudukkottai
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Last updated 22-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ganesan
Adv. Balakrishnan.N
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chidambaram
Case History
-
24-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Jun-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
29-Apr-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
Copy of depositionView PDF
This case (O.S. 12/2023) involves a civil dispute between Ganesan (petitioner) and Chidambaram (respondent) regarding a financial transaction. Ganesan claims he received ₹10,00,000 from Chidambaram on 29.12.2019 and disputes allegations that he failed to repay ₹3,10,000 or provide required documentation. The court examined Ganesan's affidavit and supporting evidence regarding signatures, documentation authenticity, and the financial transaction details. The court found Ganesan's explanations satisfactory and ruled in his favor, accepting his version of facts and dismissing the respondent's claims against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
03-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
07-Feb-2026
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
07-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
06-Dec-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
21-Nov-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
21-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
17-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
24-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
13-Oct-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
13-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
08-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
20-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
02-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
23-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
09-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
02-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
16-Apr-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
28-Mar-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
13-Mar-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
12-Mar-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
04-Mar-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
04-Mar-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
17-Feb-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
04-Feb-2025
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
21-Jan-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
21-Jan-2025
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
22-Oct-2024
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
20-Sep-2024
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
27-Jun-2024
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
05-Apr-2024
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
21-Feb-2024
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
18-Dec-2023
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
22-Nov-2023
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
11-Oct-2023
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
03-Oct-2023
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
22-Sep-2023
Appearance
Principal District Judge
-
09-Sep-2023
Lok Adalat
Principal District Judge
-
30-Aug-2023
Lok Adalat
Principal District Judge
-
12-Aug-2023
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
10-Aug-2023
Lok Adalat
Principal District Judge
-
10-Jul-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
09-Jun-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
19-Apr-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
17-Mar-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
07-Feb-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
09-Jan-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Dec-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 12/2023
This case (O.S. 12/2023) involves a civil dispute between Ganesan (petitioner) and Chidambaram (respondent) regarding a financial transaction. Ganesan claims he received ₹10,00,000 from Chidambaram on 29.12.2019 and disputes allegations that he failed to repay ₹3,10,000 or provide required documentation. The court examined Ganesan's affidavit and supporting evidence regarding signatures, documentation authenticity, and the financial transaction details. The court found Ganesan's explanations satisfactory and ruled in his favor, accepting his version of facts and dismissing the respondent's claims against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts