Baskaran vs Subbaiah — 77/2020
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7R1. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNPD010017942020
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
Filing Number
894/2020
Filing Date
12-08-2020
Registration No
77/2020
Registration Date
06-10-2020
Court
Principal District Court, Pudukkottai
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Baskaran
Adv. Sivarasu.S.P
Respondent(s)
Subbaiah
Panjavarnam
Balamurugan
Poonkodi
Saroja
Jayalakshmi
Minor. Arulmurugan, Rep by his Guardian and Father Balamurugan
Adv. AMEER HUSSAIN.M.J
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Written Statement
Trial
Trial
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Written Statement |
| 07-03-2026 | Trial |
| 13-02-2026 | Trial |
| 07-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 02-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary Petition Allowed. The Principal District Judge of Pudukkottai allowed the plaintiff's interlocutory application under Order VI, Rule 17 of the CPC to amend the plaint in a partition suit. The court found that the proposed amendments were merely consequential changes following earlier orders (abandoning the 'B' schedule property and declaring the 7th defendant as major) and did not introduce a new cause of action, making the amendment permissible. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Petition Allowed. The Principal District Judge of Pudukkottai allowed the plaintiff's interlocutory application under Order VI, Rule 17 of the CPC to amend the plaint in a partition suit. The court found that the proposed amendments were merely consequential changes following earlier orders (abandoning the 'B' schedule property and declaring the 7th defendant as major) and did not introduce a new cause of action, making the amendment permissible. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts