Krishnamoorthi vs Inspector of Police, Thirugokarnam Police Station Crime No.167/2024 — 7/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 440. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLR - Criminal Revision Petition

CNR: TNPD010014522025

e-Filing Number

19-03-2025

Filing Number

1163/2025

Filing Date

26-Mar-2025

Registration No

7/2025

Registration Date

26-Mar-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Pudukkottai

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

167

Police Station

Thirugokarnam

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 440

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Krishnamoorthi

    Adv. Kulam Nabi Azath M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Thirugokarnam Police Station Crime No.167/2024

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai allowed the Criminal Revision Petition and ordered the return of seized gold jewels to the petitioner/owner on interim custody pending trial, citing the Supreme Court precedent that valuable articles should not be kept in police custody for extended periods. The court imposed conditions including a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, photographs of the jewels, and an affidavit ensuring the petitioner would produce the jewels when required and not sell or alter them until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Principal District Judge

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Principal District Judge

  6. 03-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  7. 08-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  8. 21-Nov-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  9. 11-Nov-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  10. 29-Oct-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  11. 27-Oct-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  12. 23-Sep-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  13. 26-Aug-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  14. 07-Jul-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  15. 30-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  16. 13-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  17. 04-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  18. 29-Apr-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  19. 21-Apr-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  20. 15-Apr-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  21. 26-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 26-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai allowed the Criminal Revision Petition and ordered the return of seized gold jewels to the petitioner/owner on interim custody pending trial, citing the Supreme Court precedent that valuable articles should not be kept in police custody for extended periods. The court imposed conditions including a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, photographs of the jewels, and an affidavit ensuring the petitioner would produce the jewels when required and not sell or alter them until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case