Krishnamoorthi vs Inspector of Police, Thirugokarnam Police Station Crime No.167/2024 — 7/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 440. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.

CRLR - Criminal Revision Petition

CNR: TNPD010014522025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

19-03-2025

Filing Number

1163/2025

Filing Date

26-03-2025

Registration No

7/2025

Registration Date

26-03-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Pudukkottai

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

167

Police Station

Thirugokarnam

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 440

Petitioner(s)

Krishnamoorthi

Adv. Kulam Nabi Azath M

Respondent(s)

Inspector of Police, Thirugokarnam Police Station Crime No.167/2024

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

13-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

Orders

10-02-2026

Orders

03-01-2026

Arguments

08-12-2025

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Copy of Order

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai allowed the Criminal Revision Petition and ordered the return of seized gold jewels to the petitioner/owner on interim custody pending trial, citing the Supreme Court precedent that valuable articles should not be kept in police custody for extended periods. The court imposed conditions including a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, photographs of the jewels, and an affidavit ensuring the petitioner would produce the jewels when required and not sell or alter them until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai allowed the Criminal Revision Petition and ordered the return of seized gold jewels to the petitioner/owner on interim custody pending trial, citing the Supreme Court precedent that valuable articles should not be kept in police custody for extended periods. The court imposed conditions including a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, photographs of the jewels, and an affidavit ensuring the petitioner would produce the jewels when required and not sell or alter them until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Pudukkottai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case