Krishnamoorthi vs Inspector of Police, Thirugokarnam Police Station Crime No.167/2024 — 7/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 440. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.
CRLR - Criminal Revision Petition
CNR: TNPD010014522025
e-Filing Number
19-03-2025
Filing Number
1163/2025
Filing Date
26-03-2025
Registration No
7/2025
Registration Date
26-03-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Pudukkottai
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
167
Police Station
Thirugokarnam
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Krishnamoorthi
Adv. Kulam Nabi Azath M
Respondent(s)
Inspector of Police, Thirugokarnam Police Station Crime No.167/2024
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | Orders |
| 10-02-2026 | Orders |
| 03-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 08-12-2025 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai allowed the Criminal Revision Petition and ordered the return of seized gold jewels to the petitioner/owner on interim custody pending trial, citing the Supreme Court precedent that valuable articles should not be kept in police custody for extended periods. The court imposed conditions including a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, photographs of the jewels, and an affidavit ensuring the petitioner would produce the jewels when required and not sell or alter them until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai allowed the Criminal Revision Petition and ordered the return of seized gold jewels to the petitioner/owner on interim custody pending trial, citing the Supreme Court precedent that valuable articles should not be kept in police custody for extended periods. The court imposed conditions including a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, photographs of the jewels, and an affidavit ensuring the petitioner would produce the jewels when required and not sell or alter them until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts