Vadivel vs Inspector of Police,Viralimalai Police Station, Crime No.98/2026 — 691/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPD010012482026

Filing Number

987/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

691/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Pudukkottai

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

98

Police Station

Viralimalai.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2)
Mines & Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 Section 21(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vadivel

    Adv. Sivakumar. P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police,Viralimalai Police Station, Crime No.98/2026

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge of Pudukkottai granted anticipatory bail to Vadivel, accused of stealing gravel sand in violation of the Mines and Minerals Act, after finding that the material investigation was substantially complete and the accused demonstrated willingness to comply with bail conditions. The court imposed stringent conditions including a ₹2,000 non-refundable deposit to a welfare fund, ₹10,000 personal bond with sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, and surrender within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 691/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge of Pudukkottai granted anticipatory bail to Vadivel, accused of stealing gravel sand in violation of the Mines and Minerals Act, after finding that the material investigation was substantially complete and the accused demonstrated willingness to comply with bail conditions. The court imposed stringent conditions including a ₹2,000 non-refundable deposit to a welfare fund, ₹10,000 personal bond with sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, and surrender within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case