Ilayaraja vs Inspector of police, udaiyalipatty Police station, Crime No.23/2026 — 689/2026

Case under Arms Act, 1959 Section 20,25(1). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPD010012442026

Filing Number

983/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

689/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Pudukkottai

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Arms Act, 1959 Section 20,25(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ilayaraja

    Adv. Gajendran.P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of police, udaiyalipatty Police station, Crime No.23/2026

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai granted bail to Ilaiyaraja, accused under the Arms Act for possessing a sword and threatening the public, considering his period of incarceration since February 21, 2026, and completed investigation. Bail was granted with stringent conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, prohibition on witness tampering, and restrictions on leaving the jurisdiction without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 689/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai granted bail to Ilaiyaraja, accused under the Arms Act for possessing a sword and threatening the public, considering his period of incarceration since February 21, 2026, and completed investigation. Bail was granted with stringent conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, prohibition on witness tampering, and restrictions on leaving the jurisdiction without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case