Arumugam vs Inspector of Police,Aranthangi Police Station, Crime No.446/2025 — 688/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code 1860 Section 465,468,471,420. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 26th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNPD010012432026
Filing Number
982/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
688/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Pudukkottai
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
446
Police Station
Aranthangi.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arumugam
Adv. Balamurugan.P
Respondent(s)
Inspector of Police,Aranthangi Police Station, Crime No.446/2025
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 18-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 17-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 12-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Arumugam, who was accused of creating fake insurance policies and fraudulently collecting premiums under IPC sections 465, 468, 471, and 420. The court found that the investigation was at a preliminary stage with the petitioner's involvement not yet determined, making it premature to grant anticipatory bail, and noted the investigation officer could issue notice under CrPC section 41(a) if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Arumugam, who was accused of creating fake insurance policies and fraudulently collecting premiums under IPC sections 465, 468, 471, and 420. The court found that the investigation was at a preliminary stage with the petitioner's involvement not yet determined, making it premature to grant anticipatory bail, and noted the investigation officer could issue notice under CrPC section 41(a) if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts