Abdul Raguman vs Inspector of Police,Adhanakottai Police Station Crime No.16/2026 — 666/2026

Case under Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Acts 2003 Section 6,24(1). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPD010011972026

Filing Number

942/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

666/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Pudukkottai

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

16

Police Station

Adhanakkottai

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Acts 2003 Section 6,24(1)
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 275,123

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Abdul Raguman

    Adv. Muthaiya. Solai

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police,Adhanakottai Police Station Crime No.16/2026

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to Abdhul Rahman, accused of COTPA Act violations for possessing 225 packets of Hans (tobacco product), upon executing a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties and stringent conditions including daily reporting to police for 30 days and remaining within Kanniyakumari District. The court found the investigation nearly complete, considered the period of incarceration, and applied established bail principles balancing accused's flight risk against evidence tampering concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 666/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to Abdhul Rahman, accused of COTPA Act violations for possessing 225 packets of Hans (tobacco product), upon executing a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties and stringent conditions including daily reporting to police for 30 days and remaining within Kanniyakumari District. The court found the investigation nearly complete, considered the period of incarceration, and applied established bail principles balancing accused's flight risk against evidence tampering concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case