Abdul Raguman vs Inspector of Police,Adhanakottai Police Station Crime No.16/2026 — 666/2026
Case under Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Acts 2003 Section 6,24(1). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNPD010011972026
Filing Number
942/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
666/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Pudukkottai
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
16
Police Station
Adhanakkottai
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Abdul Raguman
Adv. Muthaiya. Solai
Respondent(s)
Inspector of Police,Adhanakottai Police Station Crime No.16/2026
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 05-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to Abdhul Rahman, accused of COTPA Act violations for possessing 225 packets of Hans (tobacco product), upon executing a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties and stringent conditions including daily reporting to police for 30 days and remaining within Kanniyakumari District. The court found the investigation nearly complete, considered the period of incarceration, and applied established bail principles balancing accused's flight risk against evidence tampering concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to Abdhul Rahman, accused of COTPA Act violations for possessing 225 packets of Hans (tobacco product), upon executing a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties and stringent conditions including daily reporting to police for 30 days and remaining within Kanniyakumari District. The court found the investigation nearly complete, considered the period of incarceration, and applied established bail principles balancing accused's flight risk against evidence tampering concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts