Sakul Ameedu vs Inspector of Police,D CB Pudukkottai Police Station Crime No.5/2026 — 663/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 417,420. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPD010011922026

Filing Number

938/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

663/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Pudukkottai

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

5

Police Station

District Crime Branch, Pudukkottai.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 417,420

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sakul Ameedu

    Adv. Ramkumar.A

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police,D CB Pudukkottai Police Station Crime No.5/2026

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai dismissed the bail petition of Sahul Hameedhu, accused of cheating under IPC sections 417 and 420 for allegedly receiving Rs. 50 lakhs for jewel shop extension. The court found that investigation was still pending, strong prosecution objections were raised, and the petitioner failed to demonstrate any change in circumstances to warrant bail after the earlier dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 663/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai dismissed the bail petition of Sahul Hameedhu, accused of cheating under IPC sections 417 and 420 for allegedly receiving Rs. 50 lakhs for jewel shop extension. The court found that investigation was still pending, strong prosecution objections were raised, and the petitioner failed to demonstrate any change in circumstances to warrant bail after the earlier dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case