Akamadu Maideen vs Inspector of Police,D CB Pudukkottai Police Station Crime No.5/2026 — 662/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 417,420. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPD010011912026

Filing Number

937/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

662/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Pudukkottai

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

District Crime Branch, Pudukkottai.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 417,420

Petitioner(s)

1.Akamadu Maideen

Adv. Hajimohamed.J

Respondent(s)

1.Inspector of Police,D CB Pudukkottai Police Station Crime No.5/2026

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
07-Mar-2026

Copy of OrderView PDF

The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai dismissed the bail petition of Ahamadhu Maidheen, who was charged under IPC sections 417 and 420 for allegedly receiving Rs. 50 lakhs from the complainant for jewel shop extension and cheating him. The court rejected bail citing the serious nature of the cheating charge, ongoing investigation, strong prosecution objections, and the petitioner's failure to demonstrate any change in circumstances since the earlier dismissal by the Magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
07-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal District Judge
06-Mar-2026

Issue of Service

Principal District Judge
05-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
05-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 662/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai dismissed the bail petition of Ahamadhu Maidheen, who was charged under IPC sections 417 and 420 for allegedly receiving Rs. 50 lakhs from the complainant for jewel shop extension and cheating him. The court rejected bail citing the serious nature of the cheating charge, ongoing investigation, strong prosecution objections, and the petitioner's failure to demonstrate any change in circumstances since the earlier dismissal by the Magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.