Velayudham vs Inspector of Police,Sammattividuti Police Station Crime No.28/2026 — 635/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),74,118(1),351(3). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPD010011372026

Filing Number

898/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

635/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Pudukkottai

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

28

Police Station

Sammattividuthi.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),74,118(1),351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Velayudham

    Adv. Palraj.S

  2. 2.Sarashvathi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police,Sammattividuti Police Station Crime No.28/2026

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai granted anticipatory bail to Velayutham and Saraswathi, accused of assault charges (BNS sections 296(b), 74, 118(1), 351(3)) arising from a civil dispute-related quarrel. The court found that investigation was nearly complete, injured parties discharged from hospital, and no serious prosecution objection existed. Bail was granted with conditions including Rs.10,000 bond with sureties, weekly police reporting, 30-day surrender deadline, and potential FIR registration for absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 635/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai granted anticipatory bail to Velayutham and Saraswathi, accused of assault charges (BNS sections 296(b), 74, 118(1), 351(3)) arising from a civil dispute-related quarrel. The court found that investigation was nearly complete, injured parties discharged from hospital, and no serious prosecution objection existed. Bail was granted with conditions including Rs.10,000 bond with sureties, weekly police reporting, 30-day surrender deadline, and potential FIR registration for absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case