Kathiravan vs Inspector of police , Keeramangalam PS, Cr.No. 31/2026 — 596/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),115(2),118(1),351(2). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNPD010010672026

Filing Number

838/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

596/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Pudukkottai

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

31

Police Station

Keeramangalam.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),115(2),118(1),351(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kathiravan

    Adv. Loganathan.N

  2. 2.Somiya

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of police , Keeramangalam PS (Police Station), Cr.No. 31/2026

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai, dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Kathiravan and Somiya, who were charged with assault causing grievous injury under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(2). The court found the nature and gravity of the injury serious enough, and considering strong prosecution objections and the Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia precedent criteria, held it undesirable to grant anticipatory bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 596/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai, dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Kathiravan and Somiya, who were charged with assault causing grievous injury under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(2). The court found the nature and gravity of the injury serious enough, and considering strong prosecution objections and the Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia precedent criteria, held it undesirable to grant anticipatory bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case